ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2025
Real-Time Balancing of Stability and Plasticity in Continual Learning Enables Adaptive Speed Estimation for Lower-Limb Prostheses.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A primary challenge in continual learning (CL) for wearable robotics, especially prosthetics, is balancing the need to retain learned knowledge (stability) with the necessity to adapt to new information (plasticity). This balance is crucial for online adaptation, enabling systems to transition between tasks without losing prior knowledge. In this paper, we introduce a novel online optimizer-based framework designed to manage the stability-plasticity balance through strategic datapoint replay and learning-rate adjustments of a deep neural network. We applied this framework to speed estimation systems for transfemoral prostheses (TFA users), conducting offline validation tests using data from 10 individuals with TFA, and online tests with three TFA and six able-bodied (AB) participants. Our results demonstrate statistically significant improvements: in offline settings, our method showed a 39.2% increase in stability and a 35.2% boost in plasticity over traditional CL approaches during leave-one-subject-out validation. Similarly, in real-time trials with AB participants, we observed statistically significant gains in handling both previously encountered and new walking speeds. Finally, trials with individuals with TFA showed that the system improved the plasticity of the baseline model by 67.45% and the stability of the traditional CL approach by 31.36%; reducing overall average walking speed estimation error by 19.47%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.