Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583105›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2026

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Adivitch Sripusanapan, Natee Deepan, Bheem Pongsukvechkul, Suphatcha Kittiwongsopon, Min Choon Tan, Pattara Rattanawong, Dan Sorajja, Win-Kuang Shen, Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul, Narut Prasitlumkum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adivitch SripusanapanDepartment of Medicine, John A.Burns School of Medicine University of Hawaii Honolulu Hawaii USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3338-1193
Natee DeepanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3231-8705
Bheem PongsukvechkulFaculty of Medicine Thammasat University Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8903-1403
Suphatcha KittiwongsoponDepartment of Anesthesiology, Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand.
Min Choon TanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA.
Pattara RattanawongDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-5854
Dan SorajjaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1976-6420
Win-Kuang ShenDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA.
Ronpichai ChokesuwattanaskulDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-7447
Narut PrasitlumkumSport and Genetic Electrophysiology Clinic Pali Momi Heart Center, Pali Momi Medical Center, Hawaii Pacific Health Aiea Hawaii USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Catheter ablation is increasingly used for rhythm control in this population, yet its clinical outcomes remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate arrhythmia recurrence and clinical outcomes following catheter ablation compared with medical therapy in patients with CA. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception through December 2025 for studies evaluating catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in CA. Cohort studies reporting arrhythmia recurrence and/or clinical outcomes were included. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmia (AA) following ablation. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke. Random-effects models were used to pool event rates and odds ratios (ORs). Results: Thirteen observational studies comprising 797 patients with CA and AF were included. The pooled rate of freedom from AA following catheter ablation was approximately 50% (95% CI 37%-63%; I Conclusions: In patients with CA, catheter ablation was associated with modest arrhythmia-free survival and lower odds of all-cause mortality. However, all contributing studies were observational cohorts. Randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

ablationatrial fibrillationcardiac amyloidosis

Identifiers

PMID42583105
PMCPMC13459644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.