ArticlePsychological test and assessment modeling2026
Development of a Cognitive Screen Item Bank: Assessment of Individuals Across the Cognitive Spectrum, Including Advanced Dementia.
Article in Psychological test and assessment modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An item bank of cognitive items targeting the spectrum of cognitive function, with a focus on advanced dementia was developed with data from residents in long term services and supports (LTSS) settings. Latent variable models, including item response theory and factor analyses were applied to fifty items from multiple cognitive screening measures assessing memory, orientation, naming, attention, calculation, and following directions. Because the intent was to use the item bank to measure overall cognition, subdomains were not modeled. Factor analyses tested for essential unidimensionality, followed by application of an item response theory-based graded response model, including differential item functioning to examine measurement equivalence. The total sample size was 6,921, with 1,874 (27.1 %) males and 5,040 (72.9 %) females. The average age was 82.5 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.