ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Evaluation of Google search trends for COVID-19 vaccination administration efforts within an urban department of public health.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the utility of the Google COVID-19 Vaccination Search Insights (VSI) dataset for predicting and forecasting COVID-19 vaccine doses. Methods: This retrospective, ecological time-series analysis used Google VSI data and Chicago Data Portal COVID-19 Daily Vaccinations dataset to predict and forecast weekly COVID-19 vaccination doses administered in Chicago between January 4, 2021 and December 20, 2021. Model performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean percent differences between the predicted and forecasted vaccination values and actual doses administered. Results: SARIMAX models incorporating Google COVID-19 vaccination search frequencies, lagged by an average of 1.67 weeks, improved in-sample predictive accuracy relative to univariate SARIMA models, with gains most pronounced in high-vulnerability communities (High CCVI ZIP codes; mean RMSE reduction 84.73% across cross-validation iterations). Improvements in out-of-sample forecasting were similarly concentrated in High CCVI ZIP codes; in the remaining ZIP codes, SARIMAX forecasts were less accurate than SARIMA. SARIMAX forecasts produced narrower 95% confidence intervals across all strata, indicating greater model confidence. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the potential utility of the Google COVID-19 VSI dataset as a supplementary tool for informing COVID-19 vaccination distribution planning and resource allocation, particularly in socially vulnerable communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.