Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583046›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2026

Immune-preserving radiotherapy and perioperative immunotherapy in stage III NSCLC: a narrative review of current management and future directions for IIIA/IIIB NSCLC.

Zeta Chow, Charles B Simone, Haibo Lin, Jun Yang, Mark Bernard, Weisi Yan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zeta ChowThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Charles B SimoneNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Haibo LinNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jun YangJunXin Oncology Group, Jinan, China.
Mark BernardDepartment of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Weisi YanDepartment of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease with outcomes limited by distant failure, treatment-related toxicities, and loss of immune fitness during chemoradiation. Randomized trials support perioperative immunotherapy (IO) for resectable disease and consolidation durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) for unresectable disease. Immune-preserving radiotherapy (RT)-encompassing immune organ-at-risk (iOAR) and effective dose to immune cells (EDIC)-aware planning, judicious hypofractionation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT)-is an emerging lever to optimize immune competence during treatment. This study aims to synthesize contemporary evidence for stage IIIA/IIIB management through a dual-track framework (resectable versus unresectable disease), outline practical algorithms integrating surgery, RT, and systemic therapy, and highlight translational strategies including SFRT and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)-based approaches, while clearly distinguishing established standards from investigational concepts. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of pivotal trials and practice-shaping studies, emphasizing perioperative IO (neoadjuvant chemo-IO ± adjuvant IO), the PACIFIC paradigm, RT dose/fractionation strategies, and approaches to mitigate RT-related lymphopenia. We propose an evidence-anchored clinical pathway and a checklist for immune-preserving RT. Key Content and Findings: Neoadjuvant nivolumab-chemotherapy improves pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in resectable disease (CheckMate 816). Perioperative pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-671), durvalumab (AEGEAN), and nivolumab (CheckMate 77T) significantly prolong EFS. In unresectable stage III, durvalumab after cCRT confers durable OS benefit (5-year OS 42.9%), whereas uniform dose escalation to 74 Gy did not improve survival. RT-related lymphopenia is frequent and prognostic; reducing low-dose bath, minimizing exposure to iOARs, and optimizing target selection may preserve immune competence. SBRT/SFRT integrations and TIL-based cellular approaches warrant prospective testing but remain investigational. Conclusions: A dual-track algorithm-perioperative chemo-IO for operable IIIA and cCRT followed by durvalumab for unresectable IIIA/IIIB-remains the evidence-based standard. Refinements that prioritize immune preservation (iOAR-aware planning, limited-field and hypofractionated strategies) represent promising areas of investigation that should not compromise tumor control. In patients with oncogene-driven disease, targeted therapy should be considered. When surgical resection is performed, tissue acquisition for molecular profiling and, in the context of clinical trials, TIL expansion may support personalized treatment strategies. These investigational approaches require prospective validation.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapyimmune organ-at-risk (iOAR)lymphopeniaperioperative immunotherapy (perioperative IO)Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (stage III NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID42583046
PMCPMC13458758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.