ArticleMaterials & design2026
Cyclic temperature-dependent response of unit cell auxetic structures in an additively manufactured shape memory alloy.
Article in Materials & design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanical response of additively manufactured NiTi sinusoidal hexagonal re-entrant auxetic structures, focusing on the combined influence of temperature and local geometry. The NiTi alloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) was thermomechanically characterised to identify conditions promoting enhanced superelastic response, while X-ray micro-computed tomography was used to assess internal porosity. Monotonic and strain-controlled cyclic tensile tests were performed on auxetic cells with three different fillet radii, using a dedicated setup combining digital image correlation and closed-loop temperature control. The results reveal a clear separation between material- and geometry-driven effects. Temperature primarily governs the load levels through the superelastic response of the alloy, whereas auxetic deformation behaviour and failure mechanisms are mainly controlled by the structural geometry, particularly the fillet radius. Increasing the fillet radius significantly affects the deformation and failure response of the auxetic structures, altering the relationship between failure strain and absolute displacement through the corresponding change in cell geometry. The experimentally measured Poisson's ratio was compared with predictions from analytical models. Although these overestimate the auxetic response, they provide a reasonable first-order estimate. These findings provide insight into the design of additively manufactured NiTi auxetic architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.