Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583004›Full record

ReviewWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2026

Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in preoperative staging and resectability assessment for cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal metastasis.

Michał Kazanowski, Paweł Lesiak, Jędrzej Wierzbicki, Bartosz Kapturkiewicz, Paweł Maciejewski, Marcin Pawłowski, Joanna Osuch, Tomasz Jastrzębski, Marek Bębenek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michał KazanowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology, and Hematology, Wrocław, Poland.
Paweł LesiakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology, and Hematology, Wrocław, Poland.
Jędrzej WierzbickiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology, and Hematology, Wrocław, Poland.
Bartosz KapturkiewiczDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology, and Hematology, Wrocław, Poland.
Paweł MaciejewskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology, and Hematology, Wrocław, Poland.
Marcin PawłowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology, and Hematology, Wrocław, Poland.
Joanna OsuchDepartment of Radiology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology, and Hematology, Poland.
Tomasz JastrzębskiDepartment of Oncological Surgery, PCZ Brzeziny Hospital, Brzeziny, Poland.
Marek BębenekDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology, and Hematology, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is increasingly used in the preoperative evaluation of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) who are considered for cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Cross-sectional imaging has limited accuracy for assessing small-bowel and mesenteric disease, which are key determinants of resectability. DL may improve patient selection and reduce the frequency of nontherapeutic laparotomy. Aim: We aimed to summarize current evidence on the feasibility, diagnostic performance, and clinical impact of DL in patients with PM undergoing qualification for CRS-HIPEC. Materials and methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted. The studies were identified through a search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases, supplemented by manual reference screening. Eligible publications included prospective retrospective cohorts, multicenter studies, diagnostic accuracy trials, and reviews reporting outcomes of DL for CRS-HIPEC. The data were synthesized thematically. No meta-analysis was performed. Results: A total of 29 studies were included. Across 3632 procedures, DL was successfully completed in 98.3% of the patients. As many as 1034 individuals (28.5%) were excluded from CRS-HIPEC based on laparoscopic findings. Reduction in the frequency of futile laparotomy was reported across various tumor types, including colorectal metastasis (approximately 12%-17%), gastric cancer (approximately 30%), and ovarian cancer (approximately 58%, when combined with computed tomography findings). Peritoneal cancer index underestimation occurred in 40%-63% of the mixed cohorts, mainly due to limited visualization of the small bowel. Positive predictive value for complete cytoreduction ranged from 80% to 95%. Major morbidity was below 2% in most series. Conclusions: DL is a safe and accurate staging tool that improves patient selection for CRS-HIPEC, reduces the need for nontherapeutic laparotomy, and supports timely initiation of appropriate therapy. It should be considered a key component of contemporary staging pathways for PM.

Indexed as

cytoreductive surgerydiagnostic laparoscopyhyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyperitoneal cancer indexperitoneal metastasis

Identifiers

PMID42583004
PMCPMC13458922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.