ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Efficacy and safety of oral pentoxifylline on semen parameters and reproductive hormones in idiopathic male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Male infertility accounts for nearly half of infertility cases, with abnormal semen quality being a major cause. Pentoxifylline (PTX), a methylxanthine derivative with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, has been proposed to improve semen parameters, but evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of oral PTX supplementation compared with placebo in improving semen parameters and reproductive hormone profiles in infertile men. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to July 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral PTX with placebo in infertile men were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Primary outcomes included semen parameters (sperm concentration, total motility, morphology, semen volume). Secondary outcomes comprised serum hormones [testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH)]. Data were pooled calculating mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Five RCTs involving 455 participants were included. PTX dosages ranged from 800 to 1,200 mg/day, with treatment durations of 3 to 6 months. PTX supplementation correlated with increased total sperm motility (MD =10.44, 95% CI: 3.57-17.30) and normal morphology (MD =3.86, 95% CI: 1.01-6.71). Sperm concentration transiently improved at 3 months but did not differ significantly from placebo at 6 months. No significant differences were observed in testosterone (MD =0.22, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.67) or FSH (MD =-1.51, 95% CI: -4.16 to 1.14) levels, whereas LH decreased marginally (MD =-0.97, 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.49). Reported adverse events were predominantly mild and gastrointestinal. Conclusions: PTX supplementation appears to enhance sperm motility and morphology in infertile men with a favorable safety profile. Its effects on sperm concentration and reproductive hormones are less consistent, and evidence on ultimate clinical effectiveness regarding pregnancy and live birth rates remains unproven. Larger, high-quality trials with reproductive endpoints are needed to clarify its clinical role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.