ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026
Global country-level network analysis of mental disorders.
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental disorders are major contributors to the global burden of disease and may show correlated incidence patterns across countries. We characterized the country-level ecological network of age-standardized incidence rates for 10 mental disorders, identified statistically central disorders and examined how individual countries influenced estimated network connectivity. Data for 204 countries and territories, including Sociodemographic Index values, were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. A regularized network model using the mgm framework estimated conditional associations among country-level variables. Strength centrality and case-deletion delta-centrality analyses assessed disorder connectedness and country influence, with bootstrap procedures evaluating stability. Approximately 400 million incident cases of the studied disorders were estimated globally in 2023. Anorexia nervosa and bipolar disorder had the highest strength centrality, indicating broader conditional connections with other disorders. Australia, the United States, Iran, China and Finland showed relatively large delta-centrality values, suggesting greater influence on estimated centrality than most countries. Strength centrality stability was acceptable but modest. These findings provide a descriptive, hypothesis-generating view of how modeled incidence rates covary across countries and should not be interpreted as individual-level comorbidity, causal influence or direct policy priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.