Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42582841›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

What makes our brain unique: Insights from a two-night fMRI-EEG sleep study.

Fan Nils Yang, Dante Picchioni, Jacco A de Zwart, Peter van Gelderen, Jeff H Duyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fan Nils YangAdvanced MRI Section, Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2565-6594
Dante PicchioniAdvanced MRI Section, Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Jacco A de ZwartAdvanced MRI Section, Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Peter van GelderenAdvanced MRI Section, Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Jeff H DuynAdvanced MRI Section, Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectomes (FCs) derived from fMRI are unique to an individual and can be reliably distinguished from those of others. However, the neurobiological basis for this "fingerprint"-like uniqueness remains unclear. One hypothesis holds that FC fingerprinting reflects idiosyncratic conscious experiences, while an alternative suggests that stable, intrinsic brain functional network structure underpins individual specificity. To test these hypotheses, we analyzed FC fingerprints across sleep stages using a two-night concurrent EEG-fMRI dataset from healthy participants and exploited the natural fluctuations in consciousness that occur across the sleep-wake cycle: during sleep, consciousness gradually diminishes from N1 to N3 non-REM (NREM) sleep, then partially reemerges during REM sleep. Contrary to the consciousness-dependent hypothesis, we found that FC fingerprinting remained robust, and in fact improved during deep, unconscious sleep (N3) relative to wakefulness. Moreover, the brain networks contributing most to individual identification shifted across sleep stages, with hippocampal connectivity playing a larger role during N3. Finally, using a deep-learning classifier (multi-layer perceptron) on short (90 seconds) fMRI segments, we demonstrated high identification accuracy; notably, models trained on deep-sleep data generalized well across all stages, including wakefulness. These findings favor the view that individual-specific network architecture rather than moment-to-moment conscious experience underlies FC fingerprints, with important implications for their use as biomarkers in both healthy and clinical populations.

Indexed as

brain fingerprintsdeep learningdynamic functional connectivityhippocampusN3 stage

Identifiers

PMID42582841
PMCPMC13459065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.