Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42582822›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2026

Urine Dithionite-guided Hemoperfusion in Acute Paraquat Poisoning: A Retrospective Observational Study from South India.

Ramesh Yelanati, Dharanindra Moturu, Supriya Rayana, Mohammad Noor Shaik, Karthikeya Jampala, Venkata Dinesh Kumar Gontla, Ramesh B Potineni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Herbicide Crisis: Addressing the High Fatality of Paraquat Poisoning.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ramesh YelanatiDepartment of Nephrology, Aster Ramesh Hospital, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5390-5115
Dharanindra MoturuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-5460
Supriya RayanaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, KL College of Pharmacy, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-2574
Mohammad Noor ShaikDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, KL College of Pharmacy, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9430-5531
Karthikeya JampalaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aster Ramesh Hospital, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8519-259X
Venkata Dinesh Kumar GontlaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-3808
Ramesh B PotineniDepartment of Cardiology, Aster Ramesh Hospital, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6983-0828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims and background: Paraquat (PQ) poisoning has a mortality rate of 50-90% with no specific antidote. Hemoperfusion (HP) is used for PQ removal, but evidence for its efficacy is limited, and optimal strategies for guiding HP remain poorly defined. The study aims to describe a urine sodium dithionite test (UDT)-guided HP protocol and evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with acute PQ poisoning. Patients and methods: A retrospective observational study of 27 consecutive patients with acute PQ poisoning admitted to a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) in South India was conducted. Serial UDT was used to guide HP initiation, continuation, and cessation. Clinical data, treatment details, and outcomes were analyzed. Survivors and non-survivors were compared. Results: Mean age was 30.5 ± 11.2 years (74.1% male). Fourteen patients (51.9%) survived. Ingestion-to-door (I-to-D) time ≤4 h was present in 71.4% of survivors vs 20% of non-survivors. Urine sodium dithionite test negative conversion within 10 h occurred in 77.8% of survivors vs 16.7% of non-survivors. Survivors received more HP sessions (mean: 3.3 vs 2.6). Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in 80% of non-survivors vs 14.3% of survivors. Conclusion: Early presentation combined with a UDT-guided HP protocol was associated with favorable outcomes. Serial UDT provides a practical, low-cost tool for guiding extracorporeal treatment (ECTR) in resource-limited settings. Clinical significance: The UDT-guided HP protocol offers intensivists a bedside decision-making tool that replaces costly plasma PQ assays, enabling evidence-based ECTR decisions in Indian ICU settings where quantitative assays are unavailable.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryCritical careDithionite testExtracorporeal treatmentHemoperfusionHerbicide poisoningParaquatPoisoning

Identifiers

PMID42582822
PMCPMC13458497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.