Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42582814›Full record

ReviewJournal of current glaucoma practice

Ambient Air Pollution and Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

Divya Jain, Bitesh Kumar, Anjan K Dhua, Sharanyaa Krishnamurthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of current glaucoma practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Divya JainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Bitesh KumarDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Delhi, India.
Anjan K DhuaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Delhi, India.
Sharanyaa KrishnamurthyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jothi Eye Care Centre, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, and environmental risk factors beyond intraocular pressure (IOP) are increasingly being investigated. Ambient air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), may contribute to glaucomatous optic neuropathy through oxidative stress and vascular dysregulation; however, existing evidence remains fragmented. Objective: To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the association between ambient air pollution exposure and glaucoma risk, IOP, and structural markers of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to 30 Results: Eighteen observational studies from diverse geographic regions were included, of which eight contributed to the PM₂.₅ meta-analysis. Higher long-term PM₂.₅ exposure was associated with an increased risk of glaucoma (pooled RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.18), with moderate heterogeneity ( Conclusion: Long-term PM₂.₅ exposure is associated with increased glaucoma risk, suggesting a potential environmental contribution; however, causality cannot be established from the available observational evidence. These findings highlight the need to integrate ocular outcomes into environmental health policy and to prioritize prospective studies capable of addressing confounding and temporality.

Indexed as

Air pollutionEnvironmental exposureGlaucomaMeta-analysisOptic neuropathyPM₂₅

Identifiers

PMID42582814
PMCPMC13458504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.