Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42582794›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2026

Impact of an Acute Kidney Injury Prevention Bundle in High-risk Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Single Center Before-After Study.

Vittobaraju Muralidharan, Anusha Cherian, Muthapillai Senthilnathan, Pankaj Kundra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Acute Kidney Injury Prevention in the Real World: Is Bundled Approach a Scalable Solution?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vittobaraju MuralidharanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7619-7757
Anusha CherianDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9017-5311
Muthapillai SenthilnathanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-5046
Pankaj KundraDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-7932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and serious complication in critically ill patients and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and significant healthcare costs. We evaluated the impact of an AKI prevention bundle on the incidence, severity, and outcomes in patients at high-risk of developing AKI in the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients and methods: In this single-center before-and-after study, high-risk patients were identified using a prediction score. A bundle comprising daily assessments, risk factor modification, nephrotoxin avoidance, hemodynamic optimization, and renal dose adjustment was implemented after a 2 months education period. Preimplementation lasted 6 months, followed by 8 months of bundle application. Outcomes including AKI incidence and severity, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), length of ventilation days and ICU stay, and mortality were compared between pre- and post-implementation groups. Results: A total of 374 patients were included, 187 in the pre and 187 in the post implementation phase. The primary outcome, incidence of AKI within 72 hours of ICU admission, was lower in the post-bundle implementation group than pre-bundle implementation group (21.9 vs 27.8%); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Overall incidence of AKI was lower in the post-bundle group than in the pre-bundle group (28.9 vs 37.9%); while between 72 hours and 1week, incidences were 6.9 vs 10.1%, which were not statistically significant. Importantly, moderate-to-severe AKI was significantly reduced post-bundle implementation (13.9 vs 25.6%, Conclusion: While the AKI prevention bundle did not significantly affect overall AKI incidence in high-risk ICU patients, it was associated with reductions in moderate-to-severe AKI, ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. A simple clinical risk score can identify patients for early intervention, and larger multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryAKI prevention bundleBundle careCritically ill patientsRenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID42582794
PMCPMC13458382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.