ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Robust phase unwrapping for Dixon magnetic resonance imaging multiresolution pixel clustering and local surface fitting.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Water-fat separation plays a crucial role in clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. However, the Dixon technique is encumbered by the challenge of water-fat swapping due to factors such as magnetic field inhomogeneity and low image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This study aimed to develop a multiresolution pixel clustering and local surface fitting (MrCLOSE) phase-unwrapping method to improve the robustness of water-fat separation in two-point Dixon MRI. Methods: MrCLOSE first constructs a multiresolution pyramid via acquired in-phase and out-of-phase complex MRI. It then performs hierarchical phase unwrapping with pixel clustering and local surface fitting (CLOSE) within a coarse-to-fine multiresolution framework. The performance of MrCLOSE was systematically evaluated and compared with those of B0 mapping with magnitude-based correction for bipolar two-point Dixon (B0-NICEbd), rapid opensource minimum spanning tree algorithm (ROMEO), Graph Cut, and the original CLOSE algorithm with both simulation and Results: In the simulation data, MrCLOSE achieved robust phase unwrapping under different thresholds, varying SNRs, disconnected regions, and phase changes from 4π to 10π. In the threshold-dependence simulation, CLOSE showed high error ratios of 43.71% and 94.74% at thresholds of π/10 and π/5, whereas MrCLOSE reduced these values to 0.67% and 0.11%, respectively. In additional simulations involving varying SNRs, disconnected regions, and increasing phase changes, MrCLOSE consistently maintained low error ratios and outperformed ROMEO and Graph Cut. In the 355 Conclusions: By innovatively integrating multiresolution strategies into CLOSE, MrCLOSE achieves high robustness and accuracy in phase unwrapping and provides a promising solution for phase-related MRI applications, particularly for water-fat separation in clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.