Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42582712›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Secondary Food Habits Associated With Smoking.

Manoj Prabhakar, Kavitha B, Preetha Elizabeth Chaly, Ramesh Kumar Sg, Ardhanaari M

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manoj PrabhakarDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Kavitha BDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Preetha Elizabeth ChalyDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Ramesh Kumar SgDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Ardhanaari MDepartment of Psychiatry, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kanchipuram, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood intake patterns among smokers represent a complex behavioral phenomenon, wherein, beyond general dietary habits, smokers often engage in specific food consumption during or immediately after smoking episodes. These "secondary food substances" include sugary products such as chocolates, candies, sweeteners, and chewing gum, menthol-based items, hot and cold beverages, carbonated drinks, mouth fresheners, and occasionally smokeless tobacco products. Such practices may be driven by factors including the desire to mask the odor or taste of smoke, sensory gratification, cravings, accessibility, peer influence, and media exposure.

aimThis study aimed to develop a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing secondary food consumption behavior during or immediately after smoking.

methodsA systematic approach was adopted to design a structured questionnaire that focused on secondary food habits associated with smoking episodes. Item generation was based on a literature review and behavioral constructs related to secondary food substance use. The construct includes five categories: types of secondary food substances; frequency of use; reasons for using such food substances; attempts to quit; and craving, tolerance, and dependence developed toward the food substances. The entire set of items was refined and validated through focus group discussions, content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.

resultsThe questionnaire comprised 10 items and demonstrated excellent content validity, with an overall Content Validity Index of 0.97. All items exhibited factor loadings above 0.50, confirming satisfactory construct validity. Itemwise correlation coefficients ranged from 0.11 to 0.81, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Furthermore, the intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.72 to 0.91, reflecting high test-retest reliability of the instrument.

conclusionSecondary food consumption habits associated with smoking may contribute to additional dependencies and adversely affect nutritional health, thereby compounding the harmful effects of the primary habit, smoking. The present study addresses a critical gap in the literature by introducing a dedicated assessment tool to systematically evaluate these behaviors, with potential applications in research and behavioral interventions.

Indexed as

dietary habitseating behaviorfood habitsquestionnairesmoking

Identifiers

PMID42582712
PMCPMC13458347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.