ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Comparative outcomes of minimal-incision versus standard hydrocelectomy: reduced bleeding and healthcare utilization in a multi-surgeon cohort.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Minimal-incision hydrocelectomy reduces bleeding, but has it solved recurrence?-a look back at a century of technique.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hydrocelectomy is one of the most commonly performed benign scrotal procedures, but postoperative complications such as hematoma, infection, and wound-related issues remain common.Minimally invasive approaches to hydrocelectomy may reduce perioperative morbidity and healthcare utilization. Minimally invasive approaches may reduce perioperative morbidity and postoperative healthcare utilization. The minimal-incision modified fenestration technique (MIMFeT), performed under local anesthesia, has not been evaluated in a multi-surgeon, real-world setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes of MIMFeT Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 313 patients who underwent hydrocelectomy [2018-2024]. Patients underwent either MIMFeT or standard hydrocelectomy based on surgeon preference. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications (bleeding, infection, and/or reoperation). Secondary outcomes included unplanned postoperative healthcare utilization and recurrence. Results: Among 313 patients (132 MIMFeT; 181 standard), overall complication rates were lower with MIMFeT (6.1% Conclusions: When compared to standard hydrocelectomy technique, MIMFeT provides comparable efficacy with elimination of bleeding events and reduced postoperative healthcare utilization. These findings support MIMFeT as a particularly advantageous option for patients at elevated bleeding risk and as a scalable, office-based alternative to standard hydrocelectomy that may improve patient outcomes while reducing healthcare resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.