Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42582679›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Wireless detector-based magnetic resonance imaging for grading assessment of the peridiscal attachments in temporomandibular joint internal derangement.

Xinge Cheng, Jingfeng Huang, Zhijie Su, Xiuchao He, Zhuyuan Ding, Xinzhong Ruan, Xianchun Zeng, Yuning Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinge ChengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Jingfeng HuangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Zhijie SuDepartment of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Xiuchao HeDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Zhuyuan DingDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Xinzhong RuanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Xianchun ZengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Yuning PanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The relationship between the peridiscal attachments and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangement (ID) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the association between graded imaging features of the peridiscal attachments and disc displacement using wireless detector-based magnetic resonance imaging (WD-MRI). Methods: This retrospective study included 61 patients (122 TMJs) diagnosed with TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). All patients underwent oblique sagittal proton density-weighted imaging in both closed- and open-mouth positions using WD-MRI. Two radiologists independently assessed disc position [normal, disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), or disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR)] and performed ordinal grading (1-3 points: clearly, indistinctly, or non-visualized) of four peridiscal attachments: the anterior attachment superior (AAS), anterior attachment inferior (AAI), posterior attachment superior (PAS), and posterior attachment inferior (PAI). Inter-observer reliability between the two radiologists was evaluated using the weighted kappa coefficient. Group differences and correlations between attachment scores and disc position were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation analysis. Results: A total of 122 TMJs (12 normal, 37 DDWR, and 73 DDWOR) were evaluated using WD-MRI. Peridiscal attachment scores differed significantly among the three groups (all P<0.05). The inter-observer reliability for AAS, AAI, PAS, and PAI demonstrated substantial to almost perfect agreement, with weighted kappa values of 0.838 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.746-0.930], 0.896 (0.825-0.967), 0.852 (0.774-0.930), and 0.799 (0.705-0.893), respectively. Mann-Whitney U tests revealed that peridiscal attachment grades in the DDWOR group were significantly higher than those in both the normal and DDWR groups across all four attachments (Z=2.571-6.572, r=0.279-0.738, all P<0.05). However, when comparing the DDWR and normal groups, a significant difference was observed only for PAI (Z=2.653, P<0.05), with no significant differences for AAS, AAI, or PAS (P>0.05). The grading of the peridiscal attachments showed significant positive correlations with disc reducibility. Specifically, the positive correlations were strong for PAS (r=0.720) and PAI (r=0.630), and moderate for AAS (r=0.467) and AAI (r=0.356). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that structural alterations in the peridiscal attachments, particularly the posterior attachment, are significantly correlated with TMJ ID severity on WD-MRI, suggesting their potential value in TMD assessment.

Indexed as

internal derangement (ID)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)temporomandibular disorders (TMD)Temporomandibular joint (TMJ)

Identifiers

PMID42582679
PMCPMC13457888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.