ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Spinal cord stimulation for concurrent improvement of consciousness and spasticity following severe traumatic brain injury: a case study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spasticity frequently complicates disorders of consciousness (DoC) after severe brain injury, yet effective treatments addressing both conditions remain limited. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has shown promise in treating each condition independently, but its application in patients with concurrent DoC and spasticity has rarely been systematically investigated. Methods: We report a 30-year-old man with prolonged DoC and severe limb spasticity following traumatic brain injury who underwent dual-level percutaneous SCS lead implantation. Frequency screening was performed to identify optimal stimulation parameters, followed by 21 days of continuous stimulation. Assessments included the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Hip Adductor Tone Scale (HATS), surface electromyography (sEMG), electroencephalography (EEG), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Results: Frequency screening identified 80 Hz as the optimal parameter for spasticity reduction. After 21 days of stimulation, the CRS-R score increased from 5 to 10, MAS improved from 3-4 to 1-1+ , and HATS decreased from 3 to 1. sEMG showed reduced muscle activity and spectral shifts consistent with decreased spasticity. EEG demonstrated enhanced frontotemporal functional connectivity and increased spectral power. TMS motor evoked potential latency was significantly shortened. Clinical improvements were sustained at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusion: This case suggests that 80 Hz SCS may be associated with concurrent improvement in consciousness and spasticity in patients with DoC following severe brain injury, accompanied by electrophysiological correlates of altered neural connectivity and corticospinal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.