Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42582604›Full record

ArticleStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction

Bifocal Lengthening with Monorail External Frame for Severe Shortening of the Femur: A Case Report.

Giuseppe Geraci, Vitantonio Digennaro, Riccardo Ferri, Federico Ruta, Antonio Mazzotti, Alberto Di Martino, Cesare Faldini

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giuseppe GeraciDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute; Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-5031
Vitantonio DigennaroDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Riccardo FerriDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Federico RutaDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Antonio MazzottiDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute; Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Alberto Di MartinoDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute; Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-4951
Cesare FaldiniDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute; Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim and background: Femoral lengthening using a monorail external frame often involves creating two simultaneous distraction sites. This approach allows for a better distribution of the osteogenesis process and can reduce the overall treatment duration, particularly in cases of severe shortening. However, the literature on bifocal femoral lengthening is limited, with reported cases rarely exceeding 10 cm of lengthening. This case report aims to describe the treatment and outcome of a patient who underwent bifocal lengthening with a monorail external frame for severe femoral shortening. Case description: A 26-year-old female presented with a 23 cm shortening of the left lower limb resulting from previous surgeries for infection. She underwent bifocal femoral lengthening using a monorail external frame, achieving 20 cm of lengthening. Following the removal of the external fixator, a fracture occurred in the regenerated bone, necessitating intramedullary nailing. Conclusion: For severe femoral shortening, various lengthening techniques can be considered. Bifocal lengthening with a monorail external frame offers specific advantages and disadvantages that should be evaluated based on factors such as required treatment duration, expected patient compliance, and infection risks. Clinical significance: This case demonstrates that substantial femoral lengthening may be achievable with a monorail external frame, especially when two simultaneous osteotomies are utilised. For large bone regenerates, even with radiographic evidence of callus maturation, internal stabilisation may be advisable, despite the peculiar technical challenges involved.

Indexed as

Bone reconstructionCase reportExternal fixationExternal fixator lengtheningFemoral reconstructionFemurFemur fractureFree fibula flapLoss of bone substanceOrthopaedics

Identifiers

PMID42582604
PMCPMC13458045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.