Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42582603›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Point-of-care ultrasound as a frontline tool for suspected acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

André Timóteo Sapalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

André Timóteo SapaloRibeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-7757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although computed tomography angiography (CTA) remains the reference diagnostic modality, rapid bedside assessment is often required in hemodynamically unstable patients. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a potential adjunctive tool for early diagnosis and risk stratification. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of POCUS in patients with suspected acute AD. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2005 and January 2025. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS in adult patients with suspected AD were included. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analyses were calculated. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, and ten contributed data to the quantitative synthesis. The pooled analysis demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 0.86 [99% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.90] and specificity of 0.84 (99% CI: 0.78-0.89) for bedside ultrasound in the detection of acute AD. Diagnostic performance was more favourable for Stanford type A disease than for distal dissections. Visualization of an intimal flap was the most specific sonographic finding, whereas pericardial effusion, aortic root enlargement, and acute aortic regurgitation provided important complementary information for clinical assessment. Evidence from recent perspective cohorts further supports the incorporation of POCUS into structured diagnostic pathways for patients with suspected acute aortic syndromes (AAS). Conclusions: Bedside ultrasound represents a valuable component of the initial evaluation of suspected acute AD, particularly in emergency and critical care environments. Although confirmatory imaging remains mandatory for definitive diagnosis, POCUS can facilitate early recognition of AAS, support hemodynamic assessment, and help identify complications requiring urgent intervention.

Indexed as

acute aortic syndrome (AAS)Aortic dissection (AD)diagnostic accuracyechocardiographypoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)

Identifiers

PMID42582603
PMCPMC13457797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.