ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Collaborations between healthcare and public health in rural settings.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Local health departments and healthcare organizations in rural areas face challenges, including workforce shortages and complex population health-related needs. While they share related roles in their communities, incentives to collaborate may be sparse. Methods: Using a 2-tiered qualitative approach, we describe the purpose, motivations, benefits, and barriers to collaborations between local health departments and healthcare delivery organizations serving rural communities, with a focus on workforce factors. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted, including 18 interviews with individuals from local organizations and 6 interviews with representatives of membership groups that support these organizations. Interviews were analyzed using a deductive rapid coding process. Results: We find that collaborations are necessary, common, and often driven by workforce or other capacity limitations. However, potential competition for staff, differing structures, and a lack of familiarity with the role of public health were identified as barriers to robust and sustained collaborations. Conclusions: There are potential benefits of collaborations between local health departments and healthcare organizations in rural areas, including for both the organizations and community. Developing and sustaining collaborations requires time, resources, and relationships. Inherent to collaborative work is a need for communication across professions, including the articulation of each organization's role, expertise, and value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.