ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Quantitative assessment of prostate cancer using an individualized apparent diffusion coefficient intensity scale: a proposal.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this retrospective study, the diagnostic performance of an individualized apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) signal intensity (SI) scale for differentiating prostate cancer (PCa) from benign simplified Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (S-PI-RADS) 4 lesions detected on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) was evaluated. A total of 102 patients with biopsy-confirmed PCa and 79 patients with benign lesions (inflammation, HGPIN, ASAP) presenting as S-PI-RADS 4 were included. An individualized ADC SI scale was generated for each patient using maximum and minimum ADC values from the bladder and femoral head, respectively. The midpoint (ADC_mean) and the percentage difference (PD) between ADC_mean and lesion intensity (ADC_lesion) were calculated. Differences and diagnostic performance were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. PCa lesions demonstrated significantly lower ADC values and higher PDs compared with benign lesions (P<0.001). ROC analysis of PD yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.798. Using a PD cut-off of 14.67%, sensitivity and specificity for detecting PCa were 73.5% and 94.9%, respectively. Intra-reader repeatability was high [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.92-0.94], and PD values remained robust across variations in ADC fitting. The individualized ADC SI scale provides a patient-specific quantitative measure that effectively distinguishes malignant from benign S-PI-RADS 4 lesions. This approach complements visual bpMRI assessment, demonstrates high specificity, and has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.