ArticleHealth science reports2026
Assessment of Stroke Knowledge and Perceptions Within the Palestinian Community: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide and represents an increasing public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, including Palestine. Timely detection and immediate intervention are critical for reducing stroke-related morbidity and mortality. The present study investigates the level of stroke knowledge and its determinants within the Palestinian community. Methods: A cross-sectional, structured, questionnaire-based study of the Palestinian community was conducted from June to December 2025. Participants recruited through a convenience sample technique answered the questionnaire in both electronic and print versions. Stroke knowledge was scored from 0 to 35, with good knowledge defined as ≥ 50%. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and binary logistic regression with stroke knowledge as a binary outcome (good vs. poor). Statistical significance was set at Results: Among 1539 participants (60.6% female; 58.2% aged 18-29), 54.1% demonstrated good stroke knowledge, with a mean score of 18.35 ± 8.97 out of 35. Notable knowledge gaps were identified regarding risk factors (40.4% with good knowledge), early symptoms (46.7%), and outcomes (47.7%). Hypertension (70.6%) and smoking (55.9%) were the most frequently recognized risk factors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that discussing stroke risk with a healthcare provider (aOR = 3.20, 95% CI = [2.34-4.37]; Conclusion: Stroke symptoms, risk factors, and treatment are poorly understood in the Palestinian community. These findings highlight the need for coordinated public health education and community-based awareness measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.