ArticleBrain communications2026
Posterior cortical atrophy and logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia are more specific for Alzheimer's disease pathology than probable Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately diagnosing Alzheimer's disease is challenging, as 15-30% of individuals diagnosed clinically lack evidence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes (ADNC) at autopsy. While the typical amnestic presentation of Alzheimer's disease may have limited specificity due to coexisting age-related pathologies, atypical presentations such as logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) or posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) are often associated with ADNC. This study evaluated how well clinical diagnoses of amnestic and atypical Alzheimer's disease predict ADNC and how co-pathologies contribute to clinical-pathological discordance. To evaluate how clinical diagnosis predicts ADNC, we calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) for clinical diagnoses of PCA, lvPPA, amnestic Alzheimer's disease or non-Alzheimer's disease dementia for ADNC, using four neuropathological thresholds defined by combinations of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) neuritic plaque frequency (moderate or frequent) and Braak stage (III-VI or V-VI). Analyses were replicated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.