ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Association between differences in ambient light exposure by hospital bed location and depressive symptoms among postpartum women.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Environmental light is associated with the presence of depressive symptoms in healthy individuals, major depression, and postpartum depression. We hypothesized that women for delivery assigned to window-side beds (window-side group: WG) may exhibit lower levels of depressive symptoms at discharge than those assigned to corridor-side beds (corridor-side group: CG). Methods: This retrospective study involved postpartum women who were hospitalized for delivery in the obstetric ward of Oita University Hospital. We analyzed data of the Japanese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) assessed within approximately 1 week after delivery (within 7-days EPDS) and at an outpatient visit approximately 1 month after delivery (1-month EPDS). Analysis of covariance and binomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate between-group differences in EPDS scores and in the proportion of participants with EPDS scores of 9 or higher adjusting for relevant covariates. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between within 7-days and 1-month EPDS scores. Results: A significant between-group difference was observed for within 7-day EPDS scores, with mean scores of 3.4 and 5.0 in the WG and CG, respectively. In the binomial logistic regression analysis of within 7-days EPDS, bed location and cesarean delivery were significant in the final model. No significant between-group difference was observed in 1-month EPDS. A significant positive correlation was observed between the within 7-days and 1-month EPDS scores. Discussion: These findings suggest that increasing exposure to ambient light during hospitalization for delivery may help reduce depressive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.