ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Comparison of subject-to-template registration schemes using CT and MR radiotherapy images with brain lesions.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06466720 (Measuring and Mapping Cognitive Decline After Brain Radiosurgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Measuring and Mapping Cognitive Decline After Brain Radiosurgery: a Pilot Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Voxel-based analyses have been used more widely in radiotherapy in recent years. The purpose of this study is to compare eight different methods of registering images on to a template space for such analyses. A novel way, using both CT and MR data, is proposed. Methods: CT and MR brain images from 85 participants in the CoDe-B-Rad study (NCT06466720) were registered on an age-specific template. The registration schemes used included sCT-Template (linear and non-linear); MR-Template (linear, non-linear, masked, and enantiomorphic); and Dual-Template (linear and non-linear). The registrations were compared qualitatively and quantitatively against the template MR images with scores ranging from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) and quantitatively (via Jaccard, ASD, and HD95). Results: Qualitatively, the best registration scheme was the Dual-Template-non-linear registration, with 60 participants scoring above 4. The second best was the MR-Template-enantiomorphic, with 53 participants scoring above 4. Quantitatively, the Dual-Template-non-linear method outperformed on the mean (±SD) for the ASD and HD95, with 0.918 (±0.1774) and 2.965 (±0.5392) respectively. For ASD the difference compared to other methods was significant ( Conclusion: The Dual-Template-non-linear registration scheme is a new way of registering lesioned brain images for use with voxel-wise techniques in radiotherapy, which utilises both CT and MR image data. The scheme provides fidelity of the underlying soft tissue as well as the surrounding skull, minimising anatomical and dosimetric distortions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.