ArticleAnnals of operations research2026
Longer healthy life, but for how many? A stochastic analysis of healthy lifespan inequality.
Article in Annals of operations research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Deriving and comparing healthy longevity distributions by gender and health prevalence measures: a statistical moments and maximum entropy approach.Population health metrics · 2026Article
- Catching Up on Mortality, Falling Behind on Disability: A Dynamic Decomposition of the Health-Adjusted Life Expectancy Gap between Higher-Income and Lower-Income Countries.Annals of global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 150 years, life expectancy doubled and healthy life expectancy increased. Expectations reveal nothing about variability, so we present a stochastic analysis to investigate changes over time, age and gender of variation, among individuals, in healthy lifespan, for different levels of country income. To complement health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE) data from the Global Burden of Disease Study, we use a stochastic model to compute the standard deviation of healthy life (SDHL). The model is a finite-state absorbing Markov chain with rewards. It includes stochastic survival, mortality, and loss of good health status. An individual surviving from one age to the next gains, as a "reward," a year of good health. This method provides all the moments of healthy longevity. The mean healthy longevity is exactly the HALE. As a measure of variation, here we focus on the standard deviation of healthy longevity. From 1990 to 2019, HALE increased, with greater increases at younger ages. At the same time, SDHL at younger ages decreased and at older ages increased. The most significant changes at birth occurred in low- and lower-middle-income countries. High- and upper-middle-income countries saw notable increases at old ages. Women generally have longer HALE and higher SDHL, but the overall HALE increase was greater for men. The reduction in SDHL over time suggests that more individuals benefit from increased longevity, particularly in low-income countries closing the gap with high-income countries. However, improvements in healthy survival at older ages appear unevenly distributed among individuals in high-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.