ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
From injury prevention to standardized scoring: a bibliometric analysis of thematic evolution and emerging trends in the development of the breakdance competition system (1984-2026).
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When Breaking successfully debuted at the 2024 Paris Olympic Games in France, it attracted strong attention from the academic community toward this emerging competitive sport. Given that Breaking is a newly included Olympic sport that urgently requires development and remains controversial, this review aims to conduct a quantitative analysis of the academic research achievements related to the construction of the Breaking competition system over the past more than 40 years. The researchers selected literature from the Web of Science Core Collection and the Scopus database from 1984 to 2026 as data sources and conducted bibliometric and visualization analyses using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R Bibliometrix. Meanwhile, analyses were carried out on core journals, core research teams, research countries, hot keywords, as well as the development process and development trends. The results showed that the research field of the Breaking competition system is developing vigorously. The findings are as follows: (1) The United States leads the world by a large margin in the number of publications, while the United Kingdom and Canada rank next in academic influence; several research groups have formed among the core authors, with Yang, Wyon, and Miura being typical examples. It is worth noting that Sato published the largest number of papers over the longest period of time. Among research institutions, the University of Tokyo in Japan has published the largest number of studies, while
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.