ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Benchmarking privacy and utility in synthetic tabular cohorts for Alzheimer's disease research.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benchmarking privacy and utility in synthetic tabular cohorts for Alzheimer's disease research.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe scarcity of large, clinically relevant cohorts is becoming a bottleneck in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research, as their sensitive nature makes open data sharing difficult. Privacy-preserving synthetic datasets generated with machine learning may help address this challenge.
methodsWe compared five frameworks for generating synthetic tabular data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease cohorts, with a set of empirical privacy and utility metrics. Two of the methods, DataSynthesizer and TableDiffusion, provide
resultsMethods with differential privacy achieved high privacy ratings but low levels of utility. Deep learning methods like Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN) and Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (CTGAN) also showed high privacy with limited utility. In contrast, non-private DataSynthesizer and Synthpop offered higher utility at a cost of lower privacy. DISCUSSION: The evaluated methods demonstrated a clear trade-off between privacy and utility. High privacy was generally associated with insufficient utility, highlighting the need for further research into synthetic data generation for AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.