ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Integrating environmental variables and land use types to assess the habitat suitability and atractylodin content of two
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: On the basis of species occurrence data, in this study, bioclimatic, topographic, and soil variables, as well as land use types, were integrated to predict the potentially suitable habitats of Results: The results revealed that AL was influenced primarily by the precipitation of the driest quarter (Bio17), temperature seasonality (Bio4), and mean temperature of the coldest quarter (Bio11), whereas AC showed the strongest response to the precipitation of the wettest quarter (Bio16), temperature seasonality (Bio4), and precipitation of the warmest quarter (Bio18). Under current climatic conditions, AL was primarily distributed in the southern regions of the middle and lower Yangtze River Basin, whereas AC occurred mainly in the boundary areas between semiarid and arid regions, primarily in central and northeastern China. Under future climate warming scenarios, the total suitable area of AL is projected to decline and shift southeastward, whereas that of AC is projected to contract and migrate northeastward. The atractylodin content in AL was primarily associated with variables such as isothermality (Bio3) and temperature seasonality (Bio4), whereas atractylodin accumulation in AC was influenced mainly by the precipitation of the driest quarter (Bio17) and temperature seasonality (Bio4). The stable quality distribution areas of AL were primarily located in Central China, whereas those of AC were mainly distributed in North China. Under all the climate scenarios and across all the time periods considered, dryland and forestland were consistently identified as the most suitable land use types for both Discussion: These findings may provide a scientific basis for the conservation, rational introduction, and high-quality cultivation of AL and AC, as well as for future strategies to mitigate the potential impacts of climate change on these medicinal species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.