ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Artificial intelligence for chordee measurement in hypospadias surgery: current evidence and a blinded expert-panel validation framework.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypospadias-associated ventral penile curvature, commonly referred to as chordee, is a key intraoperative finding that can influence the choice of straightening technique and the need for urethral plate preservation or transection. In routine surgery, curvature is usually estimated visually during artificial erection testing, but this approach is subjective and may vary according to surgeon experience, viewing angle, erection quality, penile rotation, and image perspective. Artificial intelligence and computer vision methods may provide a more objective and reproducible way to measure curvature from standardized operative images. Early studies have used object detection, segmentation, landmark detection, Hough-transform methods, circle fitting, and geometric angle calculation. Reported technical performance is promising, particularly in controlled model-based datasets, but the clinical evidence remains limited because real intraoperative images are heterogeneous and because reference standards vary across studies. This Review summarizes the current evidence for artificial intelligence-based penile curvature measurement in hypospadias surgery and proposes a practical validation framework for future clinical studies. The most important next step is not simply improving model accuracy, but testing locked models on standardized real intraoperative images using patient-level data separation, blinded expert-panel measurements, threshold-focused analysis around 30 degrees, and direct comparison with the operating surgeon's live estimate. At present, artificial intelligence should be considered a measurement aid for documentation, quality improvement, and decision support, not a replacement for expert surgical judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.