SynthesisFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Competition and training load of high-level competitive non-motorised surface water sports athletes: a scoping review of athlete monitoring methodology.
Synthesis in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Monitoring athletes during training and competition is necessary to gather information on athletes' fitness and fatigue to prescribe training loads more precisely. The goal of this process is to improve performance and reduce injury risk. This scoping review aimed to examine and map existing research on monitoring methods for high-level athletes in non-motorised surface water sports, thereby identifying the most commonly used method(s) in these competitive sports and guiding future research. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review framework served as the guide to provide clarity and rigour in the review. Studies included in this review were published in English in peer-reviewed journals and were identified through a systematic search of four databases: Academic Search Premier, Google Scholar, SPORTDiscus and SpringerLink. The final search of these databases was conducted in August 2025. Results: Twenty-two papers were deemed relevant for inclusion in the final review. Methodologically, the literature converged on heart rate-based internal load metrics (71%, 15/21) and GPS-derived external load metrics (47%, 8/19), however these are imported from land- and ergometer-based environments and are not yet validated against the environmental load that defines non-motorised surface water sports. Discussion: Practically, until environment-adjusted metrics exist, all metrics should be interpreted within environmental contexts. Furthermore, the review highlights the need to increase the use of athlete monitoring methods, particularly for youth and females, and in sports such as sailing and canoeing. Future research should aim to develop ecologically valid monitoring methods in a range of non-motorised surface water sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.