ArticleJAMIA open2026
Assessing the effect of race on machine learning models predicting hospital admissions from emergency department.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being developed to support healthcare delivery. However, concerns remain about their potential to perpetuate existing biases rooted in the data used to develop them. We aim to assess the impact of using race in predicting hospital admission probabilities for patients visiting the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods: Data from the MIMIC-IV ED dataset were used to train2 ML models predicting hospital admission: one included race; the other did not. Differences in predicted admission probabilities were evaluated across racial groups under multiple validation conditions. Results: Including race as a model input was associated with meaningful differences in predicted admission probabilities for White (3.2%), Black (-1.5%), and Hispanic (-3.0%) patients, while minimal differences were observed for Asian (0.2%) and Other (0.5%) patients. These differences were associated with large Cohen's Discussion: These findings suggest that race is associated with differences in ML-based hospital admission predictions for ED patients, underscoring the need for caution when incorporating race into clinical prediction models and the importance of rigorous bias assessment. Conclusion: As race was associated with predictions, there is a crucial need to address underlying social factors and the use of broader, more equitable clinical data for ML model training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.