ArticleNutrition bulletin2026
Nutrient and Discretionary Food Intake in Vegan Adult Australians: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Nutrition bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in plant-based diets, including vegan diets is increasing. Yet, there has been limited assessment of the dietary intake of contemporary vegans in Australia. Sixty-six adult Australian vegans completed a four-day, semi-weighed food diary on two occasions. Intake from diet and supplements and diet alone was compared to the Australian Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) for selected nutrients. Risk of micronutrient inadequacy was assessed using the cut-point method, with comparison to the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) or Adequate Intake (AI). The contribution of Discretionary Food (DF) intake to total energy intake was examined. A total of 466 days of dietary data were analysed after screening for under-reporting. Macronutrient distribution matched the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution ranges (AMDR). Total protein intake aligned with measures of adequacy and guidelines for optimal protein intake. Nutrients most at risk in our sample were vitamin B12, calcium, iodine, selenium, zinc and omega-3 fatty acids. Supplementation did not fully resolve under-consumption. DFs contributed 24.2% ± 11.8% to total energy intake. Our data show that macronutrient intake for adult vegans was within acceptable ranges. However, even with the addition of dietary supplements, multiple micronutrients were under-consumed. Theoretically, a well-planned vegan diet can be nutritionally adequate; however support is needed to ensure adequate intake in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.