Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581663›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2026

Weight Loss Outcomes of Routine Dietetic Treatment in Primary Care.

Annemieke van de Riet, Carliene van Dronkelaar, Barbara S van der Meij, Willemijn M Meijer, Marian A E de van der Schueren, Jacqueline A E Langius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annemieke van de RietWageningen University and Research, Human Nutrition and Health, Research Group Global Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-9364
Carliene van DronkelaarNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-2926
Barbara S van der MeijWageningen University and Research, Human Nutrition and Health, Research Group Global Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Willemijn M MeijerNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-8636
Marian A E de van der SchuerenWageningen University and Research, Human Nutrition and Health, Research Group Global Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jacqueline A E LangiusFaculty of Health, Nutrition and Sport, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics and Research Group Rehabilitation and Technology, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 10270032021001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinically relevant weight loss (≥ 5%) is a key treatment goal in dietetic care for patients with overweight or obesity. While clinical trials often demonstrate successful weight loss, less is known about success rates in routine dietetic practice, timing of weight loss and maintenance. This study examined when patients achieve and maintain ≥ 5% weight loss during 12 months of dietetic treatment in Dutch primary care, and how this relates to treatment intensity and patient characteristics. In this retrospective cohort study, routinely collected data from dietetic electronic health records (EHRs) was used. Follow-up duration was 12 months. Weight change was analysed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The study included 4503 adults (≥ 18 years) with overweight or obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m

Indexed as

DieteticsObesityOverweightWeight LossAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomedietitianobesityoverweightweight loss

Identifiers

PMID42581663
PMCPMC13462824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.