ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Antecedents and Staff Outcomes Related to Multiple Dimensions of Perceived Person-Environment Fit Among Nurses: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antecedents and Staff Outcomes Related to Multiple Dimensions of Perceived Person-Environment Fit Among Nurses: A Scoping Review.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIM(S): This study aimed to map the antecedents and outcomes related to each dimension of perceived person-environment fit (i.e., person-vocation, person-job, needs-supplies, demands-abilities, person-organization, person-supervisor, person-group fit, and value congruence) among nurses.
designScoping review.
methodsThe population, concept, and context framework were adopted. Literature published up to August 14, 2024, was included. Four databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web. For each dimension of person-environment fit, we extracted antecedents and outcomes and then categorized conceptually similar variables within each set. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was employed as the reporting method.
resultsForty-five final sources were included after screening 1,385 articles. Thirty-eight cross-sectional studies were examined. No study examined person-vocation fit. Significant antecedents were predominantly categorized into individual and organizational factors, with most demographic factors showing no significant relationship. Outcomes were categorized as staff outcomes, including competence, work attitude, performance, perception of the workplace, and psychological states. Relationships with retention-related factors, categorized under work attitude, varied in both the presence and direction across person-job and person-organization fit.
conclusionIt may be useful to actively sustain the specific dimensions of person-environment fit necessary for desired staff outcomes by leveraging both organizational support and nurses' professional development behaviors. IMPLICATIONS: To enhance perceived person-environment fit, nurse managers should foster a supportive environment that encourages growth and learning behaviors. Moreover, this study identified a research gap concerning perceived person-environment fit among nurses, and it offers valuable insights for developing fit strategies for nurses. Future studies must explore perceived person-environment fit fluctuation patterns and person-vocation fit while also identifying distinct fit profiles through cluster analysis and examining potential curvilinear relationships between fit dimensions and staff outcomes. Furthermore, intervention studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses could inform more effective fit strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.