ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Synthetic sequence alignments as programmable probes of learned conformational landscapes in deep learning protein structure predictors.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationProteins rely on conformational flexibility for biological function, yet predicting alternative states remains a major challenge in structural biology. Although deep learning models like AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, and RoseTTAFold2 excel at static structure prediction, what these networks actually learn about the underlying conformational landscapes remains largely opaque.
resultsHere we introduce synthetic multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), designed by inverse folding to encode predefined structural constraints, as a programmable intervention for interrogating the internal logic of structure prediction systems. Synthetic MSAs systematically bias AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, and RoseTTAFold2 toward distinct conformational states of fold-switching proteins, including alternative conformations inaccessible through natural sequence information alone. Adversarial experiments pairing query sequences with MSAs encoding competing folds reveal sequence-dependent responses, exposing how alignment-derived and sequence-derived signals are weighted within each system. Probing predictions initialized from molecular dynamics trajectories reveals a systematic bias toward compact, training-distribution-favored conformations. Hybrid alignments combining synthetic and natural MSA segments enable targeted steering toward specific conformational states. These results suggest synthetic MSAs as a generalizable framework for dissecting the conformational landscapes encoded by deep learning structure predictors, with direct implications for understanding model behavior and accessing biologically relevant hidden states. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Newly generated data can be found at https://zenodo.org/records/20916910. The code underlying this article is available on GitHub at https://github.com/ibmm-unibe-ch/msa-tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.