Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581537›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2026

Escalating Fire-Driven Forest Loss in Protected Tropical Forests.

Christopher G Bousfield, Oscar Morton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher G BousfieldEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3576-9779
Oscar MortonEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5483-4498

Funding

Leverhulme Trust ECF-2024-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfires are driving substantial losses of tropical forest, with climate change expected to increase fire-driven losses throughout the century. Whether Protected Areas (PAs)-and the vital habitat they protect-are buffered from fire is a key question. Here we combine PA and stand-replacing fire data to estimate that > 4 million hectares (Mha) of protected tropical forest have been lost to stand-replacing fire since 2001, with one-third of losses (1.35 Mha) occurring in 2024 alone. The vast majority of losses (89%) were concentrated in the tropical Americas (3.6 Mha), most of which occurred in Brazil (2.7 Mha), followed by Asia-Pacific (0.31 Mha) and Africa (0.14 Mha). Increasing trends in annual losses were observed across the Americas and Africa, occurring in 30 countries across the tropics. Counterfactual analysis suggests that despite considerable heterogeneity PAs most often reduce the probability of stand-replacing fires relative to non-PAs across the tropics. In the Americas, protection reduced stand-replacing fires in 48% of protected plots, rising to 71% and 55% in Africa and Asia-Pacific, respectively. However, temporal burn trends remained tightly coupled inside and outside of PAs, suggesting PAs are equally exposed to increasing global trends in fire activity. Ensuring existing PAs are protected from anthropogenic ignition sources is a priority, but subsequent PA planning must consider future fire risk to ensure they remain an effective conservation tool in a changing climate.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesFiresForestsWildfiresAfricaClimate ChangeTropical Climatebiodiversityclimate changeconservationfireprotected areatropical forest

Identifiers

PMID42581537
PMCPMC13462366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.