Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581518›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2026

Predictive evolutionary genomics: principles, validation, and practice.

Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos, Maddie E James, Yang Liu, Dan Bock, Moisés Exposito-Alonso, Loren H Rieseberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Ortiz-BarrientosSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7493-416X
Maddie E JamesSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-0187
Yang LiuAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3479-9223
Dan BockSchool of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7788-1705
Moisés Exposito-AlonsoDaniel Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-0700
Loren H RiesebergDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2712-2417

Funding

Australian Research Council DP240100280Australian Research Council FT200100169Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture CE200100015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and habitat loss are driving rapid evolutionary responses in populations world-wide, which creates an urgent need for evolutionary forecasting in conservation and agriculture. Such forecasting can be categorized into three time scales: trait-based models that use multivariate quantitative genetic equations to project correlated phenotypic responses up to c. 20 generations, allele-based analyses that model allele frequency dynamics up to 100 generations, and composite adaptation scores that aggregate many small effects to yield predictions across longer horizons. However, these approaches have remained largely disconnected. Here, we present a Bayesian framework that integrates these three complementary approaches for evolutionary prediction. Our framework combines genomic, phenotypic, and environmental data to yield probabilistic predictions with explicit uncertainty. We show how predictive evolutionary forecasts can be validated with experimental evolution, field experimentation, historical specimens, and reciprocal transplants. These validated forecasts can help advance conservation and agricultural programmes by helping predict which populations are at risk of future extinction, optimizing breeding programmes for future climates, and planning ecosystem management under environmental change. By supporting a shift towards more predictive approaches in evolutionary biology, this framework may help improve our ability to manage biodiversity and food security in a changing world.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomicsBayes TheoremClimate ChangePhenotypeReproducibility of Resultsagricultureclimate changeevolutiongenomicsplantspredictionuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42581518
PMCPMC13539985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.