ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026
Overlap-Weight Estimators With Machine-Learned Plug-Ins and Overlap-Weight Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimator.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In estimating the average treatment effect (ATE), the plug-in estimator with the efficient influence function and the targeted maximum likelihood estimator (TMLE) are semiparametrically efficient. However, the estimators suffer from the fact that too small/large a propensity score (PS) in the denominators can make the estimators unstable. This is usually overcome by trimming or truncating the data, that is, discarding observations with the PS too small/large or replacing the PS with some lower or upper threshold, which amounts to using a non-smooth weight to move the target parameter away from the ATE. This paper proposes a smooth weight, quadratic in PS instead, which leads to targeting the "overlap-weight (OW) treatment effect" that has several advantages over the ATE. We compare various estimators through simulation and empirical studies, including a trimmed efficient influence-function estimator, TMLE, and their OW versions. We find that the OW versions perform better than the trimmed ones in terms of the absolute bias and root mean squared error, when the ATE is a constant so that all estimators share the same estimand. We also find that "cross-fit" analogous to cross-validation improves the asymptotic variance estimators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.