Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581517›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026

Overlap-Weight Estimators With Machine-Learned Plug-Ins and Overlap-Weight Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimator.

Myoung-Jae Lee, Sanghyeok Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Myoung-Jae LeeDepartment of Economics, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sanghyeok LeeDepartment of Economics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In estimating the average treatment effect (ATE), the plug-in estimator with the efficient influence function and the targeted maximum likelihood estimator (TMLE) are semiparametrically efficient. However, the estimators suffer from the fact that too small/large a propensity score (PS) in the denominators can make the estimators unstable. This is usually overcome by trimming or truncating the data, that is, discarding observations with the PS too small/large or replacing the PS with some lower or upper threshold, which amounts to using a non-smooth weight to move the target parameter away from the ATE. This paper proposes a smooth weight, quadratic in PS instead, which leads to targeting the "overlap-weight (OW) treatment effect" that has several advantages over the ATE. We compare various estimators through simulation and empirical studies, including a trimmed efficient influence-function estimator, TMLE, and their OW versions. We find that the OW versions perform better than the trimmed ones in terms of the absolute bias and root mean squared error, when the ATE is a constant so that all estimators share the same estimand. We also find that "cross-fit" analogous to cross-validation improves the asymptotic variance estimators.

Indexed as

BiometryMachine LearningHumansLikelihood Functionsdouble‐debiasingefficient influence functionoverlap weightTMLE

Identifiers

PMID42581517
PMCPMC13462422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.