ArticleSmall methods2026
Minimal Input, Maximum Insight: Inferring Material Parameters From Solar Cell JV Curves Alone.
Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key challenge in the development of materials for the next generation of solar cells, sensors and transistors is linking macroscopic device performance to underlying microscopic properties. For years, fabrication of devices has been faster than our ability to characterize them. This has led to a random walk of material development, with new materials being proposed faster than our understanding. We present two neural network-based methods for extracting key material parameters, including charge carrier mobility and trap state density, in optoelectronic devices such as solar cells. Our methods require only a single measured light current-voltage curve and modest computational resources, making our approach applicable in even minimally equipped laboratories. Unlike traditional machine learning models, our methods place the final material values in a non-Gaussian likelihood distribution, allowing confidence assessment of each predicted parameter.We demonstrate these techniques on freshly fabricated PM6:Y12 and PM6:BTP-eC9 organic solar cells, and then track a single PM6:BTP-eC9 device as it degrades in air, recovering the evolution of carrier lifetime, mobility and shunt resistance. This approach enables rapid, low-cost extraction of key material parameters from simple JV measurements alone, providing a practical route to accelerate optimisation of next-generation solar-energy materials and devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.