ArticleBMC nursing2026
Foundations for growth: lived experiences of nurses one year after a clinical nursing introduction programme.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiscrepancies between academic nursing education and the realities of clinical practice may contribute to challenges during the transition from student to professional nurse. To address this, many countries and hospitals have implemented clinical introduction programmes for newly graduated nurses. However, limited knowledge exists regarding how these programmes influence nurses' experiences of transitioning into their professional role over time.
objectivesThis study seeks to explore the lived experiences of nurses one year after completing a clinical nursing introduction programme, two years post-graduation.
designThe study adopted a qualitative descriptive phenomenological design.
settingThe setting was a general hospital in southwest Sweden.
participantsThe participants comprised 12 registered nurses two years after graduation who had completed a one-year clinical nursing introduction programme.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis grounded in descriptive phenomenology.
findingsThree themes were identified: A hunger for more, responsibility for being a caring nurse, and becoming self-aware and self-confident. Two years post-graduation and one year after completing the clinical nursing introduction programme, nurses expressed a strong drive for ongoing professional and personal growth, characterized by curiosity and a desire for autonomy. They emphasized responsibility for delivering patient-centred care, often prioritizing caring values to the extent of considering leaving workplaces that failed to support these ideals. Finally, participants reported increased confidence and self-awareness, viewing help-seeking as a sign of professional security rather than weakness. This development was supported by collegial relationships and reflective discussions on ethical dilemmas.
conclusionsThe clinical nursing introduction programme may provide an important foundation for ongoing professional and personal growth. The findings suggest that protected time, peer interaction, reflective practice, and supportive management were perceived as contributing to a developmental trajectory from 'being' to 'becoming' a nurse, while supporting lifelong learning, caring values, and clinical confidence. However, these perceived longer-term benefits should be interpreted with caution, as they may also reflect broader processes of professional maturation and workplace socialisation. The findings indicate that introduction programmes that incorporate opportunities for reflection, collegial support, and leadership engagement may help support the continued development of competence and confidence beyond the programme period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.