ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Three-Tiered Nodal Staging System Improves Prognostic Utility for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent American Joint Committee on Cancer staging utilizes a binary classification for nodal staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). We evaluated a previously proposed three-tier nodal classification and its association with chemotherapy benefit using the National Cancer Database.
methodsPatients with resected iCCA were identified from the National Cancer Database. Nodal status was reclassified as N0 (no positive nodes), N1 (one to two positive nodes), or N2 (three or more positive nodes). Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score matching.
resultsA total of 6365 patients met the inclusion criteria (N0: 4358 [68%]; N1: 1438 [23%]; N2: 569 [9%]). Median overall survival decreased in a stepwise fashion across proposed N stages: 55.3 months (N0), 24.5 months (N1), and 19.0 months (N2) (p < 0.001), with further separation seen in the cohort of patients with at least six harvested lymph nodes. On multivariable Cox analysis, both N1 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-2.22) and N2 (HR 2.59; 95% CI 2.26-2.98) were independently associated with worse survival than N0. The proposed system demonstrated superior model performance than binary staging (delta Akaike information criterion 9, likelihood ratio test p < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a larger change in restricted mean survival time in node-positive patients (N1: 5.2 months; N2: 4.0 months) compared with node-negative patients (N0: 1.4 months).
conclusionsThree-tier nodal classification provides superior prognostic stratification than binary American Joint Committee on Cancer staging in resected iCCA. Node positivity is associated with a larger absolute change in survival compared with node-negative patients, suggesting utility in systemic treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42581281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.