ArticleBiologia futura2026
Influence of facultative hibernation on memory retention in two closely related hamster species.
Article in Biologia futura, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hibernation is characterized by repeated torpor-arousal cycles during which profound physiological suppression occurs, but its effect on memory retention remains controversial. This may be partly due to the fact that most previous studies have focused on obligatory hibernators, often examining only single species, which can limit comparability between studies. We investigated whether facultative hibernation affects memory retention in two closely related species: the Mongolian hamster (Allocricetulus curtatus) and Eversmann's hamster (Allocricetulus eversmanni), whose hibernation is characterized by short torpor bouts lasting up to 48 h. Animals were trained in the operant conditioning and spatial maze tasks before hibernation and retested after a three-month hibernation period. We found no significant effect of hibernation on general memory retention or species-specific differences in the operant conditioning task. In the spatial maze task, overall performance of the Firth penalized logistic regression model was not significant (p = 0.054), however, a species x hibernation interaction effect was significant, indicating hibernation affected spatial memory retention differently in the two studied species, with a positive effect in Mongolian hamsters and a likely different (negative or missing) effect in Eversmann's hamsters. These results suggest that the effect of hibernation on memory retention can be task-dependent and can vary between species with similar torpor-arousal patterns under the same environmental conditions for hibernation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42581268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.