ReviewPharmaceutical research2026
In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC) in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: Models, Regulatory Perspectives and Translational Challenges.
Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) represent a clinically established yet mechanistically complex platform for systemic drug administration, offering advantages such as avoidance of hepatic first-pass metabolism, sustained drug input and improved patient adherence. However, their development and regulatory evaluation remain challenging due to the physiological variability of the skin barrier, site-dependent absorption and formulation-skin interactions. In vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) has therefore emerged as a critical translational framework for linking in vitro permeation characteristics with systemic pharmacokinetic outcomes and thereby supporting formulation optimization, regulatory decision-making and reduction of repetitive clinical studies. This review provides a comprehensive and integrative analysis of IVIVC in TDDS, encompassing experimental methodologies, mechanistic modelling strategies, regulatory perspectives and translational challenges. Emphasis is placed on the limitations of classical empirical correlations when applied to transdermal systems, where lag time, cutaneous depot formation and nonlinear absorption frequently violate traditional IVIVC assumptions. Mechanistic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approaches are highlighted as more robust alternatives capable of incorporating skin physiology, variability and formulation-specific effects. Evidence from successful and unsuccessful case studies demonstrates that predictive IVIVC is achievable but strongly dependent on methodological standardisation, model validity and physiological representation. Regulatory frameworks currently regard IVIVC primarily as a supportive tool; however, increasing integration with Quality-by-Design (QbD) principles, model-informed drug development (MIDD) and advanced experimental platforms indicates growing acceptance. The review ultimately reframes IVIVC for TDDS as a continuum of translational strategies rather than a binary outcome and identifies key knowledge gaps whose resolution will be essential for advancing predictive, regulatorily trusted IVIVC models for next-generation transdermal therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42581259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.