Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581259›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2026

In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC) in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: Models, Regulatory Perspectives and Translational Challenges.

Uday Sankar Chakrabarty, Amrita Chakraborty, Mainak Mal, Dibya Sinha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Uday Sankar ChakrabartySchool of Pharmacy, Bhawanipur Global Campus, Kolkata, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3166-2624
Amrita ChakrabortySchool of Pharmacy, Bhawanipur Global Campus, Kolkata, India. amrita.chakraborty@bhawanipurglobal.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0131-8549
Mainak MalSchool of Pharmacy, Bhawanipur Global Campus, Kolkata, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1986-3304
Dibya SinhaSchool of Pharmacy, Bhawanipur Global Campus, Kolkata, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5781-3106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) represent a clinically established yet mechanistically complex platform for systemic drug administration, offering advantages such as avoidance of hepatic first-pass metabolism, sustained drug input and improved patient adherence. However, their development and regulatory evaluation remain challenging due to the physiological variability of the skin barrier, site-dependent absorption and formulation-skin interactions. In vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) has therefore emerged as a critical translational framework for linking in vitro permeation characteristics with systemic pharmacokinetic outcomes and thereby supporting formulation optimization, regulatory decision-making and reduction of repetitive clinical studies. This review provides a comprehensive and integrative analysis of IVIVC in TDDS, encompassing experimental methodologies, mechanistic modelling strategies, regulatory perspectives and translational challenges. Emphasis is placed on the limitations of classical empirical correlations when applied to transdermal systems, where lag time, cutaneous depot formation and nonlinear absorption frequently violate traditional IVIVC assumptions. Mechanistic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approaches are highlighted as more robust alternatives capable of incorporating skin physiology, variability and formulation-specific effects. Evidence from successful and unsuccessful case studies demonstrates that predictive IVIVC is achievable but strongly dependent on methodological standardisation, model validity and physiological representation. Regulatory frameworks currently regard IVIVC primarily as a supportive tool; however, increasing integration with Quality-by-Design (QbD) principles, model-informed drug development (MIDD) and advanced experimental platforms indicates growing acceptance. The review ultimately reframes IVIVC for TDDS as a continuum of translational strategies rather than a binary outcome and identifies key knowledge gaps whose resolution will be essential for advancing predictive, regulatorily trusted IVIVC models for next-generation transdermal therapeutics.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsModels, BiologicalSkinAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsHumansPermeabilityPharmaceutical PreparationsSkin AbsorptionTranslational Research, BiomedicalPharmaceutical PreparationsBioequivalenceIVIVCPBPK modellingRegulatory scienceSkin permeationTransdermal drug delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.