Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581190›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026

Fibrous and muscular components of the tarsal tunnel roof; a quantitative 3D anatomical study using dissection and a digital microscribe.

Georga K Bruechert, Casper G Thorpe Lowis, William H B Edwards, Quentin A Fogg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georga K BruechertThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. gkbruechert@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4729-6681
Casper G Thorpe LowisThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4783-2309
William H B EdwardsThe Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Quentin A FoggThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1074-2222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is no gold standard technique to diagnose and treat tarsal tunnel syndromes. This is due to the lack of consensus on the structures that form the roof of the tarsal tunnel. The flexor retinaculum is consistently stated to form the roof, but there is no clear understanding of the anatomy (borders, spatial relations) of this fibrous tissue. This makes the surgical release inconsistent, and potentially incomplete, when treating tarsal tunnel syndrome.

methodsThe aim of this study was to accurately describe the roof of the tarsal tunnel. Feet of embalmed Body Donors (n = 15; mean age = 84.64 ± 11.21 years; F = 7, M = 7; L = 10, R = 5) were analysed. They were dissected and modelled in virtual three-dimensional space. The relations and dimensions of all tissues were measured.

resultsThe roof was formed by both the flexor retinaculum and the abductor hallucis (AbH) muscle (n = 15), and a lateral fascia of the AbH muscle (n = 11). The tarsal tunnel roof was consistently formed by both fibrous and muscular tissues.

conclusionThese data strongly suggest that this unique, multi-tissue organisation of the roof, needs to be further assessed when surgically decompressing the contents of the tarsal tunnel. This may inform more accurate techniques for tarsal tunnel release.

Indexed as

FasciaMuscle, SkeletalTarsal Tunnel SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overCadaverDissectionFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleAbductor hallucis lateral fasciaAbductor hallucis muscleFlexor retinaculumTarsal tunnelTarsal tunnel roofTibial nerve

Identifiers

PMID42581190
PMCPMC13461760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.