Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581176›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Changes in spinal alignment after implant removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Corentin Petitpas, Thomas Bard, Codrin Popa, Solene Prost, Benjamin Blondel, Virginie Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Sebastien Pesenti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corentin PetitpasDepartment of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. petitpas.corentin@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1167-2011
Thomas BardDepartment of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Codrin PopaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Solene ProstDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Benjamin BlondelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Virginie LafageDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, USA.
Renaud LafageDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, USA.
Sebastien PesentiDepartment of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the longitudinal evolution of coronal and sagittal spinal parameters following implant removal in patients previously treated with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

methodsBetween January 2009 and December 2020, 1,650 patients underwent PSF for AIS: 25 required implant removal. Radiographic parameters assessed included proximal, main, and distal Cobb angles, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic parameters. Measurements were obtained pre- and post-PSF, pre- and post-implant removal, and at final follow-up. Longitudinal analyses used Friedman test and RM-ANOVA with adjustment for multiple comparisons and Pearson test was used for correlations.

results25 patients (21 females; mean age 15.4 ± 1.9 years) were included, with a mean follow-up of 8.6 ± 3.9 years. The mean interval between PSF and implant removal was 5.8 ± 2.7 years. Immediately after removal, proximal, main, and distal Cobb angles increased significantly (+ 3.6°, p = 0.002; +7.3°, p < 0.001; +3°, p = 0.044). No significant further progression was observed at final follow-up. Median TK increased by 10° immediately after implant removal and by 14° at final follow-up compared with the pre-removal assessment (p = 0.019). LL and pelvic parameters remained stable. Exploratory ROC analysis suggested a potential association between implant removal before 74 months and greater TK progression (+ 9.4°, p = 0.043). Progression of the main thoracic Cobb angle correlated negatively with age at implant removal (r=-0.436; p = 0.029).

conclusionFollowing implant removal after AIS fusion, moderate coronal deterioration and progressive thoracic kyphosis were observed, whereas lumbar and pelvic parameters remained stable. Early implant removal may increase the risk of postoperative kyphotic progression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV - Retrospective study.

Indexed as

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosisImplant removalPosterior spinal fusionPostoperative outcomesSpinal deformities

Identifiers

PMID42581176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.