ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Hierarchical classification of acute and chronic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the lumbar spine using X-ray images.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a hierarchical deep learning model for differentiating acute and chronic lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) using X-ray images. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed approximately 2600 lateral lumbar radiographs obtained from patients clinically suspected of having OVCFs between 2007 and 2022. After excluding poor-quality images and surgically instrumented vertebrae, 1299 radiographs (6495 vertebral patches, L1-L5) were included. Labeling was performed by neurosurgeons and radiologists using X-ray images, with CT and/or MRI findings serving as the reference standard. A two-step hierarchical classification was implemented: first classifying vertebrae into Normal-Chronic, Acute, and Indeterminate (cement-augmented vertebrae without instrumentation) groups, followed by subdivision of the Normal-Chronic group into Normal and Chronic categories.
resultsA total of 1299 radiographs were evaluated. The hierarchical model achieved an accuracy of 91% in the initial three-class step. For the detection of acute fractures in the final classification step, the model demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.0% (95% CI 84.8-95.0%), a specificity of 82.1% (95% CI 79.8-84.5%), and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.8% (95% CI 97.9-99.3%). The Normal-aligned hierarchical approach outperformed the Acute-aligned and end-to-end models, particularly for acute and chronic cases.
conclusionThe proposed hierarchical approach enhances the diagnostic utility of standard X-ray images by enabling more accurate classification of lumbar fracture types. This study is limited by its single-institution retrospective design. This model may reduce reliance on advanced imaging and support faster and more informed clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42581141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.