Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581137›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2026

When 'vape-free' should mean 'smoke-free': third-hand e-cigarette residues and the developing lung.

Alexander N Larcombe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander N LarcombeOccupation, Environment and Safety, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia. alexander.larcombe@curtin.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-cigarettes are widely perceived as a safer alternative to tobacco, and that perception often extends to their use around infants and children. Yet exhaled aerosol deposits onto indoor surfaces, leaving a residue, known as third-hand e-cigarette aerosol, that can be re-emitted, ingested, or absorbed through the skin. The developmental consequences of such exposure have been almost entirely unexplored. In this issue of Pediatric Research, Zaman et al. begin to address that gap, exposing neonatal mice to third-hand e-cigarette aerosol-contaminated terrycloth and carpet in early-life. The authors report sex-divergent outcomes: transient neutrophilic inflammation in females, and broader transcriptional disturbance, delayed alveolar maturation, gut microbiome shifts, and persistent adult obstructive lung dysfunction in males, with tobacco flavouring amplifying the male response. This commentary considers the study's strengths, outlines future research priorities, and argues that the findings strengthen the case for extending 'smoke-free' protections to vaping.

Identifiers

PMID42581137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.