ArticlePediatric research2026
When 'vape-free' should mean 'smoke-free': third-hand e-cigarette residues and the developing lung.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
E-cigarettes are widely perceived as a safer alternative to tobacco, and that perception often extends to their use around infants and children. Yet exhaled aerosol deposits onto indoor surfaces, leaving a residue, known as third-hand e-cigarette aerosol, that can be re-emitted, ingested, or absorbed through the skin. The developmental consequences of such exposure have been almost entirely unexplored. In this issue of Pediatric Research, Zaman et al. begin to address that gap, exposing neonatal mice to third-hand e-cigarette aerosol-contaminated terrycloth and carpet in early-life. The authors report sex-divergent outcomes: transient neutrophilic inflammation in females, and broader transcriptional disturbance, delayed alveolar maturation, gut microbiome shifts, and persistent adult obstructive lung dysfunction in males, with tobacco flavouring amplifying the male response. This commentary considers the study's strengths, outlines future research priorities, and argues that the findings strengthen the case for extending 'smoke-free' protections to vaping.
Identifiers
42581137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.