ReviewPediatric research2026
Engaging families with experience of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: a call to action.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) causes significant burdens to families, health care systems, and society. At a multistakeholder meeting organized by the conect4children (c4c) project, families and advocacy groups noted that their voices are under-represented during the planning and execution of research.
aimTo provide the voices of a group of HIE families from Europe and North America
methodsThis is an informal description of the personal experience of 6 families with extensive experience of HIE and advocacy. The experiences of these families were captured during teleconferences and e-mail exchanges.
resultsThe families agreed that high quality clinical care that is timely, well-organized, and evidence-based supports research. Unfortunately, best clinical practice is not universally followed. The literature provides many good practices for incorporating families into all stages of research that need to be implemented. Recommendations for engaging families in research are presented.
conclusionsEffective research will be promoted if families and people with lived experience of neonatal care are part of the study team, and study leadership, at all stages of research. Participation in research by families will be promoted by action to overcome the variations in care that affect families and to promote optimal care in all settings. IMPACT: What does this article add to the existing literature? Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy merits specific attention in the context of other types of neonatal encephalopathy. Family experience is central to research about hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. The voices of families with experience of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy are not listened to sufficiently. We propose an action plan to improve research for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in the light of family experience.
Identifiers
42581134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.